


You’re lying. THIS is the secret...





She uncaps and takes a big swallow, her face nearly turned as green as the drink as she exclaimed, "that is absolutely horrible"; she recapped the drink and dashed it in the rubbish bin.


I am guessing the tincture of moose nutz did the damage
@all vendors + consumers
Apologies for the delayed contribution.
Everyone is making valid points from their perspective and behind the lenses that we sit ultimately will impact how and what we see. We all do not see the same things, or see them the same way.
The questions posed by the OP makes a lot of sense if one was to place themselves into @Rasoul Salehi shoes.
I think the discussion should be beyond just yield, but also efficiency and openness as a community to different approaches, possibilities and ideas. I am personally very pleased to see Rasoul reach this point in his journey where he is questioning what is now either in his collection or about to form part of his collection of oudhs and I don't think he should stop asking or demand answers to those WTH is going on here scenarios he is facing...
As a perfumer-distiller that is what we encourage, a informed consumer is liberated from the marketing mist and empowered by their knowledge to hopefully make better choices and I have to agree with @Alkhadra and @Taha, consumers are responsible for their own imaginations. A vendors videos or pictures those are just snaps in time, possibly a glimpse of what the vendor wishes to share, from a part of a match bigger picture, and those images requires a lot of processing and filtering before you can allow it to form part of the inventory of information in your mind.
Informed consumers are also beneficial for the overall direction the market takes. The positive changes we see today in the online oudh scene isn't just a result of more vendors on the scene, but rather the demand and push by consumers for better prices, more variety, better quality accompanied with more fact based information and knowledge. As the drive from consumers continues (to whichever direction consumers wish to take) the oudh scene will head that way.
Back to the point about efficiency, here is a couple of things we do that will change how you might want to crunch your numbers once you go for those calculators. I can't speak for other vendors but as perfumer-distillers who pretty much run end to end operations there is more to the scenario than raw material divided by mls of oil, well at least for us anyway, and there is no reason why this cant be the case for others;
The oil isn't the only product from a distillation, especially a high end distillation. The spent matter is still very valuable post distillation. Whilst some of the oils come out of the wood during distillation, there is a lot that doesn't. On top of the remaining oils, most the resin is also intact. The spent matter can then go through further extraction either by solvent, microwave, c02 or other methods. The products from these extraction also has value. I recall earlier in this discussion someone mentioning rose. If we could take that example in Bulgaria and Turkey for example after the rose is hydro-distilled and the otto is collected. The spent matter is then solvent extracted into what is known as 'concrete' due to the solid nature of the product. These are stored in drums and when orders are received the drums are chemically processed into an oil. These oils resemble rose more than the otto both in colour and smell. The point is, it is a second product from the same raw material over which the initial cost of material can be distributed.
Secondly, it is no secret that hydro-steam distillation are at the bottom of the ladder when it comes to efficiency. There are other methods that are much more efficient and extract more of the oil from the woods. We did some work with the University of Western Australia in the mid 2000's using microwave to extract oils from sandalwood. The results were fantastic and the yield was upt0 6 times greater than hydro-steam. Is our oudh community open to such ideas, new ways? Lam'ah the great success and amazing oil that it is, would not have been possible had we not employed extraction methods together with the distillation method.
When we broaden the discussion to these other possibilities we can find answers to some of the questions the OP raised, but there are others that these examples wont explain and for those consumers should continue asking...I agree with @powdernose we can't allow shyness or fear of disrupting the status quo to hinder the sincere inquiry into these things.
Hi @powdernose you are right, and more than a fake master, i consider myself a baby blurping mother milk, I'm good with this.
@powdernose re the expiration, it is implied my post.
Re reading something with no guidance: It would put me off too.
Took 15 minutes, tops, and that was with me handing him the tools; ~$400 out the door. I paid twice, once for the part product and once for the service, needless to say that was the last time I let anyone repair my moto.
How did it happen? Easy, I was under the impression that it took some magical, secret, proprietary, 'artisinal' skill and knowledge that I deluded myself into believing I didn't have.
It's really no different with agarwood oil; from distilling, being able to differentiate a quality oil from a bad one, being able to grade wood, and the resin thing.
Around the same time, she was telling another shopper how great the drink was and all of it's benefits, all organic, and certainly better than that of any competitor;
She uncaps and takes a big swallow, her face nearly turned as green as the drink as she exclaimed, "that is absolutely horrible"; she recapped the drink and dashed it in the rubbish bin.
Don't get me wrong, she was an informed consumer and I'm far from saying that one should not be informed, but you get the message.
Let's ask a painfully simple question in order to streamline...
What specific information do folks want included in the listings?
Bearing in mind that all answers may not be known, or able to be disclosed - what would folks like to know that isn't already being disclosed?
I would also like to point out...I can't speak for everyone, but I can speak for myself - nearly all the details you mentioned so far are usually included in my listings. Jungle / country, year / time of year of distillation, species, quality of wood, etc.
I can never keep straight folks handle names and their actual names, so it's hard for me to connect if you bought any oils from me. Haha But I ask another simple question - do details really sell an oil? If they do...I imagine you would own all my distillations?

The issue of providing every iota of information isn't about the consummers (although there seem to be an awful lot of consumers trying their hand at being vendors lately) - it's about putting information out in a place where tons of other people around the world are distilling or trying to distill, make Attars / macerations / products, etc.
These are public forums and an aweful lot of folks read them. It is in no business' best interest to broadcast what sets them apart from the masses.
You can extract oil from agarwood resin , ill make a video later and show how its done , thre are hydro distilling the resin and dry distilling. Using alcohol to extra agarwood resin we can then reduce that down to only resin , give it a curing process to remove any traces of alcohol and then distill it , if done wih a dry still method we heat the resin and collect the first fraction this bubbles off in the dry still and when it goes flat the resin no more bubbles on low heat the process is stoped, this makes an oil of absolute purity, its the opposite of yeild it alchemy, lead to gold . the reduction and refinment of the very essence and soul of the agarwood. i would not even attempt this with lower grades of wood though you would need double super grade or higher . in a video ill try and show the 3 states of agar resin as i have come to learn it
[QUOTE = "AZsmell, post: 33933, membre: 594"] Désolé les gars, je renonce au secret de la basse-cour oud.
[ATTACH = full] 5144 [/ ATTACH] [/ QUOTE
It's auxiliary note

If you delve deep enough you will find that microwave as well as ultrasonics can be used to increase yield.This is very interesting. It's first time I learn about using microwave for extraction of essential oils.
I just found some links (e.g. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/128/1/012009/pdf , https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/159177155.pdf) to educate myself in this subject.
Very interesting. Thank you for sharing!
Do you know for sure how the oud you use was produced?And if not I assume from your statement that you have all your ouds chemically tested.If anybody starts tweaking the process beyond the natural and the norm it is their duty to fully disclose such methods.
Once we enter pyrolysis, God knows what byproducts are produced. Would you put it on your skin?
I wouldn't; not without chemical testing to prove it free of toxins and allergens.
Do you know for sure how the oud you use was produced?And if not I assume from your statement that you have all your ouds chemically tested.
Ok, so have you ever had any oud chemically tested? And how ever would you find out if it was produced in an "unstated fashion"?Good point. No I don't. And my pockets don't run that deep to test everything.
But if I found out that my oud was produced in some unstated fashion, that would terminate my relationship with any vendor doing so.
Am I being drilled?Ok, so have you ever had any oud chemically tested? And how ever would you find out if it was produced in an "unstated fashion"?
Apologies if you feel you are being drilled, I was just curious from your comment 'I wouldn't; not without chemical testing to prove it free of toxins and allergens." It seems odd that if you knew the process had been tweaked beyond the natural that you would have it tested but if the process is unknown then you wouldn't. Also curious if any members have had their oud tested. Is ignorance bliss or do we trust?Am I being drilled?
What is your point?
I would never feel entitled to know how they do what they do just because I buy from them.
I assure you nobody wants them to, nor does anyone want to criticize them as well. Even if we want to, they won't lose their concentration and focus. Of course, beloveds they are. And, I am afraid and I suppose, we, maybe, their beloveds as well, or may we be so.I do not want my beloved artisans to become critics, I want them to focus on what they love to do.
O no, no, dearest Farid. I re-read my post, and found my post was ambiguous. Otherwise, I know you, the man always ready to answer.Sorry most respected brother @Rai Munir I thought you were asking about chemicals to cure the rose oil at the end of hydro (or steam) distillation process of the rose otto.
Totally. At this extreme level of questioning, no doubt. Who would want it? Some of the questions posed here, one’s I stated, are valuable not because of technique or this or that but for unlearning what we have come to know. Ie darker looking agarwood is not necessarily better than light colour one. Oil rich wood could smell more pleasent than a sinking grade nugget. There is such a thing as red resin. Is wicked. And in oils:well, we are trying to learn more. But need to unlearn bunch’s stuff too.I am a beginner in the oud world so I ask you to forgive my ignorance in advance...I did not even read the whole thread only the last pages of the discussion... What I know is that if I was in any business where I would have to explain every action and every method to the consumer of my product and to explain how the product came to be... then I would quit. Better that then to be questioned over every step of doing what you love, chefs doing that seems crazy to me, what next should they all have a written certificate from an inspector that the salad was grown in a nice ph neutral earth, that there are no toxins in the tomatoes, that the manure did indeed come from horses who had eaten only certifiably fresh grass...Describing procedures is the work of the critic not of the artisan. I do not want my beloved artisans to become critics, I want them to focus on what they love to do. If they feel like sharing that is perfect but I would never feel entitled to know how they do what they do just because I buy from them. Generalities satisfy me and I do not need to hear the details if I can see that there is no discrepancy between my perception of the product and its general description.
Dearest Rasoul, your questions seemed interesting to me and in no way am I against such questions or against such lively discussions, they are part of this forum just as much as "oud of the day" is 😉. The only thing is that from the tone of some posts I felt like the vendors are being interrogated and not merely asked things out of curiosity. But "tone" can be misread on the internet as well as artisans not wanting to share on every question. No need to hold anything against anyone for such things.Totally. At this extreme level of questioning, no doubt. Who would want it? Some of the questions posed here, one’s I stated, are valuable not because of technique or this or that but for unlearning what we have come to know. Ie darker looking agarwood is not necessarily better than light colour one. Oil rich wood could smell more pleasent than a sinking grade nugget. There is such a thing as red resin. Is wicked. And in oils:well, we are trying to learn more. But need to unlearn bunch’s stuff too.
This is our artisan distiller residents chance to set the record straight in anything the like to share with us. Things they see is misunderstood by most of us but they bite their lips and font correct us. Afterall customer service is a touchy area of business.
Dearest RaiOn a lighter note, dearest Grega:
I would never feel entitled not to know how my beloved distillers do what they do just because I buy from them. Isn't it the other side of the same coin?
The thread addressed a query, no more. And the query was a curiosity to know the way I am curious to know your take about some newly released oil. Of course, here distillers are to shed light on the topic the way they shed light on the quality of their products and bla bla bla, if they are willing to, and mostly they do so.
I assure you nobody wants them to, nor does anyone want to criticize them as well. Even if we want to, they won't lose their concentration and focus. Of course, beloveds they are. And, I am afraid and I suppose, we, maybe, their beloveds as well, or may we be so.
A minor question was floated. It wasn't to derail Elon Musk's from the track and mar the projectsof zillions and zillions.
Some said it is a secret, and some shared what they had learnt. It was not about secrets, rather it was and is about sharing. If no queries and no sharing, then the forum is forced to be a corner meeting (Oud/ Attar of tyhe Day/ Night). And it is not needed as well as our beloved distiller vendors have penned down a lot of legal sized pages on websites. The rest is left always clashing olfactory vs olfactory.
But now I have realized if at all something is to be requested other than praising oils, PM option is for that purpose.
Peace and Cheers!
and in no way am I against such questions or against such lively discussions, they are part of this forum just as much as "oud of the day" is 😉
🙁It is all about sharing the way O/AOTD/N isThat was my point not that they should not be asked.
. Otherwise, none is bound to answer. Freedom of choice .