I don't understand why people elevate this simple task to legendary status. I am confident that no one can distinguish between Taiwanese and other nationalities if they distill the same batch and extract oil from it.
I think the style and or equipment used makes a big difference how the oil turns out.
Not everyone has complete temperature control but instead use big uninsulated pots or they use direct flame as a heat source or they don’t have proper stirring or they have an old school collection method off a long steam path or they let unsettled oil return to the pot in the hydrosol ( very common) or they …… I could keep going but I think it’s safe to say different distillers will come out with different smelling oils from the exact same wood .
In Taiwan they use modern methods with complete control that’s all nothing extra special just not the type of equipment you see traditionally used to distill oud.
 
I think the style and or equipment used makes a big difference how the oil turns out.
Not everyone has complete temperature control but instead use big uninsulated pots or they use direct flame as a heat source or they don’t have proper stirring or they have an old school collection method off a long steam path or they let unsettled oil return to the pot in the hydrosol ( very common) or they …… I could keep going but I think it’s safe to say different distillers will come out with different smelling oils from the exact same wood .
In Taiwan they use modern methods with complete control that’s all nothing extra special just not the type of equipment you see traditionally used to distill oud.
and no doubt skilled brew-masters who create quality and high consistency.
 
I for one like doing business with people who use the product they make . Who are they marketing to if they don’t use the products?
In my opinion the passion isn’t there when the product isn’t used by the one making and marketing it .
In the cannabis world it’s such a big money play with billions on the table everyone came running to get their piece .
Problem is they don’t even know what customers want or what is not wanted . It’s all numbers on paper not actual quality.
Yields, potency time frame , color yes but actual quality … no
Non users have no clue what consumers want and it’s beyond obvious.
In my company we won’t do business with the business man that doesn’t use the products he sells . There are enough genuine businesses that believe in the value the products bring to the customers why deal with people whose only concern is the profit? That’s why them shavings oils from Taiwan are so pricy ! They have very modern equipment and that’s probably the biggest difference from other oils made in primitive old school equipment where controlling of every parameter is harder to achieve .
Couldn't have said it better.

@Hamza H
If they don't use it, it means that it is only for business or some sort of gratification. It isnt valued with the same value system the end user does and therefore they see themselves removed from the consequences of what they do to get to the end result.
 
Were any of you guys around for the OG oud kurmudgeon, David Oller?

It was bananas during those early days… the only information was at a Yahoo! Group called “Alice’s Restaurant” and for a while one guy basically was in control the entire online narrative for anything agarwood related in the US.

Then this other guy came along and started dropping some serious practical knowledge about incense and oud…. It was a pretty positive space until those two had a schism, and it turned into this whole competitive online feud…. Some things never change! 😀

There was a wild time there where everyone was learning from each other, and everyone was excited about finally some information about incense and oud…people were trying to make different types of incense mixtures and working on methods for burning. It was a fantastic time… those early days when everyone had a fever to learn and there was lots of new information everybody was eating it all up and really supporting each other.
 
Grandawood in Australia is an AGARWOOD producer of plantation wood with a large data bank of wild and cultivated oils and they will test wood or oil from AGARWOOD for around $250 , the Canadian company I use also has a large data bank of oud . As oud becomes more popular in mainstream markets the need for testing has grown. As the market grows in the non traditional oud oil direction and the fermented oil market becomes less dominant in the overall market economy of oud , testing will play a bigger part .
Traditional oud isn’t going anywhere but as the western market grows and AGARWOOD oil use grows it’s growing in the western fashion that demands transparent clarity and clean smelling non fermented oud . To each his own and each market has its own audience and they aren’t the same and they don’t really cross each other very often.
some people can’t stand or understand fermented oils and other can’t see the beauty in unfermented oils . That’s why we basically have 2 markets in the oud world .
Very different customer bases between the two but I honestly love it all !!
Brother you know I have a lot of love for you and I don't want you to take what I say personally or the wrong way but I feel compelled to address some of the items as they aren't accurate.

Testing is independent of traditional style and non traditional style. It is also incorrect to equate fermentation to tradition that's just rubbish that was propergated online. Fermentation is a money making mechanism period has nothing to do with tradition.

This seems to continue to be an ongoing issue in the online scene where fiction and none fiction just get mixed up based on the confidence that it is said in. The two vendors who started that notion did so to scare people from exploring outside of their offerings.

Oudh is already mainstream. All the mega producers of ingredients from firmenich to givaudan purchase hundreds of KGs if not tones of oil from large investment distillers in Vietname, Thailand, Burma, Malaysia, India and Indonesia. The most common ingredient in the last decade used regardless of perfumery brand is Oudh. Nearly every brand has an Oudh fragrance. I think if it gets anymore mainstream we might end up with Oudh toilet flush 😀

What is interesting and somewhat unfortunate these mega firms they are infact also buying the fermented stuff. Which is why some large producers in some locations still ferment. So the notion that this turning event led by western market will come and IT will bring testing and transparency is inaccurate and also offensive.

As you know from your industry esting does not equate to transparency. We can just look at the cannabis industry that you are in and the multiple long running fraud issues with testing labs. The DCC has tried updating their processes and standards but the experts say that the fraud from the labs continue.

When producing hundreds of KGs off Oudh from the same plantation testing becomes easy, very much like your cannabis. The labs will set up a template based on what you are producing, they will flag compounds based on your growing conditions etc and they will identify all the compounds in the oil, develop and blueprint and keep testing against it. This type of testing is meaningful.

On the other hand let's look at the example of when you get wood from overseas, and you do a small batch, say 50ml or 100ml, the labs run some tests. These test to the end user does not mean much. It will be symbolic but without value. As you the distiller will not have enough back ground details on the wood soil conditions to be able to answer or collaborate with testing results.

Moving forward testing for plantation and organic oudhs where the soil conditions and fertilizers etc is known and also there is some level of consistency.

Providing test results for small batches is misleading to the end user in a number of ways. Two oils from the same region will have different gcms results they will present a list of compounds and their rising times this won't tell the user much. If we really want to improve the industry then we need purity teste and toxicity tests, gcms isn't the right tests. Also the labs you suggest don't infact have any sizeable database for agarwood. What they have is subscription to the national chemicals USA database, and that database does not have agarwood specific details rather compound base informatics. For $250 you will not get a test that benefits the end user.

Were any of you guys around for the OG oud kurmudgeon, David Oller?

It was bananas during those early days… the only information was at a Yahoo! Group called “Alice’s Restaurant” and for a while one guy basically was in control the entire online narrative for anything agarwood related in the US.

Then this other guy came along and started dropping some serious practical knowledge about incense and oud…. It was a pretty positive space until those two had a schism, and it turned into this whole competitive online feud…. Some things never change! 😀

There was a wild time there where everyone was learning from each other, and everyone was excited about finally some information about incense and oud…people were trying to make different types of incense mixtures and working on methods for burning. It was a fantastic time… those early days when everyone had a fever to learn and there was lots of new information everybody was eating it all up and really supporting each other.
Whilst I missed the yahoo group as it had fallen the part, I got to know many of those OGs and they were pivotal in informing me about the online scene and encouraging me to come online as a source of knowledge and experience. I am still in touch with some of them. The key with that group of people was their attitude to learn and not business, whilst their was some amongst them that sold things to share money wasn't the motivation.

The online Oudh scene still suffers from some of those early conditions, and that is authority of information/knowledge. I wish we could come up with some tool maybe even AI that could filter out the BS.

Many of those OGs dont even lerk around the Oudh scene anymore, and that is very sad.
 
Last edited:
Brother you know I have a lot of love for you and I don't want you to take what I say personally or the wrong way but I feel compelled to address some of the items as they aren't accurate.

Testing is independent of traditional style and non traditional style. It is also incorrect to equate fermentation to tradition that's just rubbish that was propergated online. Fermentation is a money making mechanism period has nothing to do with tradition.

This seems to continue to be an ongoing issue in the online scene where fiction and none fiction just get mixed up based on the confidence that it is said in. The two vendors who started that notion did so to scare people from exploring outside of their offerings.

Oudh is already mainstream. All the mega producers of ingredients from firmenich to givaudan purchase hundreds of KGs if not tones of oil from large investment distillers in Vietname, Thailand, Burma, Malaysia, India and Indonesia. The most common ingredient in the last decade used regardless of perfumery brand is Oudh. Nearly every brand has an Oudh fragrance. I think if it gets anymore mainstream we might end up with Oudh toilet flush 😀

What is interesting and somewhat unfortunate these mega firms they are infact also buying the fermented stuff. Which is why some large producers in some locations still ferment. So the notion that this turning event led by western market will come and IT will bring testing and transparency is inaccurate and also offensive.

As you know from your industry esting does not equate to transparency. We can just look at the cannabis industry that you are in and the multiple long running fraud issues with testing labs. The DCC has tried updating their processes and standards but the experts say that the fraud from the labs continue.

When producing hundreds of KGs off Oudh from the same plantation testing becomes easy, very much like your cannabis. The labs will set up a template based on what you are producing, they will flag compounds based on your growing conditions etc and they will identify all the compounds in the oil, develop and blueprint and keep testing against it. This type of testing is meaningful.

On the other hand let's look at the example of when you get wood from overseas, and you do a small batch, say 50ml or 100ml, the labs run some tests. These test to the end user does not mean much. It will be symbolic but without value. As you the distiller will not have enough back ground details on the wood soil conditions to be able to answer or collaborate with testing results.

Moving forward testing for plantation and organic oudhs where the soil conditions and fertilizers etc is known and also there is some level of consistency.

Providing test results for small batches is misleading to the end user in a number of ways. Two oils from the same region will have different gcms results they will present a list of compounds and their rising times this won't tell the user much. If we really want to improve the industry then we need purity teste and toxicity tests, gcms isn't the right tests. Also the labs you suggest don't infact have any sizeable database for agarwood. What they have is subscription to the national chemicals USA database, and that database does not have agarwood specific details rather compound base informatics. For $250 you will not get a test that benefits the end user.


Whilst I missed the yahoo group as it had fallen the part, I got to know many of those OGs and they were pivotal in informing me about the online scene and encouraging me to come online as a source of knowledge and experience. I am still in touch with some of them. The key with that group of people was their attitude to learn and not business, whilst their was some amongst them that sold things to share money wasn't the motivation.

The online Oudh scene still suffers from some of those early conditions, and that is authority of information/knowledge. I wish we could come up with some tool maybe even AI that could filter out the BS.

Many of those OGs dont even lerk around the Oudh scene anymore, and that is very sad.
Wasn’t trying to be offensive or inaccurate but as I see the oud world there are 2 separate markets and they don’t really want the same thing .
I’m glad you point out fermentation is all about profit or money making but a lot of customers in GCC seem to like fermented oud. you are correct that has nothing to do with testing or why one would choose to test. For me it’s a personal reference point for information to build my knowledge that I’ll share with interested customers but that was maybe missed . The needed transparency I speak of is people purchasing large amounts of oil that they themselves never test and then resell to customers with claims of purity that are based on nothing more than the word of a salesman., this is a very risky business.
As far as the cannabis industry testing it’s actually very good and reliable. What you read about online are just the standard vertically integrated corporate guys manipulating the results for their own benefit , they get caught , we all know which labs give boosted results for potency .
The oud testing isn’t profit generating for the product but would tell a vendor if his oil was half chemical cut or natural cut with % in certain areas being elevated.
The DCC is beyond corrupt.
Oud is even more corrupt as my eyes are open so I’ll be testing and learning from experience ,distilling little batches one after another sometimes 2 or 3 at once these days .
 
Last edited:
The testing for synthetic contaminates is important, regardless of how tests differ based on species, soil conditions, or geolocation of the agarwood. This is true for both plantations, and wild, when there are hunters who will contaminate wild trees for years leading up to harvest. It seems the question to discuss is the best way to implement it, regarding specific tests and trustworthy laboratories
 
Plus, there's nothing wrong with selling oils someone else distilled. Like, that's just business. MANY SELLERS DO THIS. Is it now the case that only the distiller should sell oils? Does he have to hint it himself, too, like Taha used to do? Where will it end.
 
Brother you know I have a lot of love for you and I don't want you to take what I say personally or the wrong way but I feel compelled to address some of the items as they aren't accurate.

Testing is independent of traditional style and non traditional style. It is also incorrect to equate fermentation to tradition that's just rubbish that was propergated online. Fermentation is a money making mechanism period has nothing to do with tradition.

This seems to continue to be an ongoing issue in the online scene where fiction and none fiction just get mixed up based on the confidence that it is said in. The two vendors who started that notion did so to scare people from exploring outside of their offerings.

Oudh is already mainstream. All the mega producers of ingredients from firmenich to givaudan purchase hundreds of KGs if not tones of oil from large investment distillers in Vietname, Thailand, Burma, Malaysia, India and Indonesia. The most common ingredient in the last decade used regardless of perfumery brand is Oudh. Nearly every brand has an Oudh fragrance. I think if it gets anymore mainstream we might end up with Oudh toilet flush 😀

What is interesting and somewhat unfortunate these mega firms they are infact also buying the fermented stuff. Which is why some large producers in some locations still ferment. So the notion that this turning event led by western market will come and IT will bring testing and transparency is inaccurate and also offensive.

As you know from your industry esting does not equate to transparency. We can just look at the cannabis industry that you are in and the multiple long running fraud issues with testing labs. The DCC has tried updating their processes and standards but the experts say that the fraud from the labs continue.

When producing hundreds of KGs off Oudh from the same plantation testing becomes easy, very much like your cannabis. The labs will set up a template based on what you are producing, they will flag compounds based on your growing conditions etc and they will identify all the compounds in the oil, develop and blueprint and keep testing against it. This type of testing is meaningful.

On the other hand let's look at the example of when you get wood from overseas, and you do a small batch, say 50ml or 100ml, the labs run some tests. These test to the end user does not mean much. It will be symbolic but without value. As you the distiller will not have enough back ground details on the wood soil conditions to be able to answer or collaborate with testing results.

Moving forward testing for plantation and organic oudhs where the soil conditions and fertilizers etc is known and also there is some level of consistency.

Providing test results for small batches is misleading to the end user in a number of ways. Two oils from the same region will have different gcms results they will present a list of compounds and their rising times this won't tell the user much. If we really want to improve the industry then we need purity teste and toxicity tests, gcms isn't the right tests. Also the labs you suggest don't infact have any sizeable database for agarwood. What they have is subscription to the national chemicals USA database, and that database does not have agarwood specific details rather compound base informatics. For $250 you will not get a test that benefits the end user.


Whilst I missed the yahoo group as it had fallen the part, I got to know many of those OGs and they were pivotal in informing me about the online scene and encouraging me to come online as a source of knowledge and experience. I am still in touch with some of them. The key with that group of people was their attitude to learn and not business, whilst their was some amongst them that sold things to share money wasn't the motivation.

The online Oudh scene still suffers from some of those early conditions, and that is authority of information/knowledge. I wish we could come up with some tool maybe even AI that could filter out the BS.

Many of those OGs dont even lerk around the Oudh scene anymore, and that is very sad.

Curious to get a better understanding of why you say fermentation is purely a moneymaking mechanism. Is fermentation not a key element of the traditional Hindi scent profile popular in the Arab world? I am new and would love to learn more
 
Curious to get a better understanding of why you say fermentation is purely a moneymaking mechanism. Is fermentation not a key element of the traditional Hindi scent profile popular in the Arab world? I am new and would love to learn more
Most of the time the words used to describe oudh aren't oudh specific terminology, and this is very much so online, and those words carry with them pre defined meanings. Fermentation is a metabolic process that produces chemical changes in organic substances through the action of enzymes, the study of this field is known as zymology. So the word has an existing clearly defined meaning, when this is applied to oudh then that meaning will naturally be assumed unless it is redefined, or further explained. As such what i said take that into account, that when distillers in the facilities that actually ferment the woods, i.e that allow for a metabolic process that produces chemical change do so for financial benefit. Why is that so? because they can then place any grade of wood into the fermentation drums, make them go through the process of metabolic chemical change, and distill the matter + the changed constituents to produce an oil that is from oudh wood and this new micro-organism.

Traditional distillation did not use fermentation, what was utilised is clean soaking. Clean soaking with the presence of clean fresh air, so the drums would not be sealed as a deliberate means of avoiding fermentation. So why soak then? wood is a porous material. This means that, over time, exposure to water will permeate the wood’s membranes, causing it soften, and fall apart, allowing the deeper oils in those pores to be extracted.

We had previously released a number of oils where one was soaked in the traditional manner as I have explained above and the other not soaked, the key difference in the oil is in its depth and longevity performance. The soaked oil will always out perform none soaked oils due to the fact that the distiller is able to draw out the deep, middle and top layer of the oil. Where as none soaked woods the oil produced is usually only middle and top layer oils. If you imagine the pores in the wood as a cup and divide the cup into bottom, middle and top, that is what is being referred to here.
 
Most of the time the words used to describe oudh aren't oudh specific terminology, and this is very much so online, and those words carry with them pre defined meanings. Fermentation is a metabolic process that produces chemical changes in organic substances through the action of enzymes, the study of this field is known as zymology. So the word has an existing clearly defined meaning, when this is applied to oudh then that meaning will naturally be assumed unless it is redefined, or further explained. As such what i said take that into account, that when distillers in the facilities that actually ferment the woods, i.e that allow for a metabolic process that produces chemical change do so for financial benefit. Why is that so? because they can then place any grade of wood into the fermentation drums, make them go through the process of metabolic chemical change, and distill the matter + the changed constituents to produce an oil that is from oudh wood and this new micro-organism.

Traditional distillation did not use fermentation, what was utilised is clean soaking. Clean soaking with the presence of clean fresh air, so the drums would not be sealed as a deliberate means of avoiding fermentation. So why soak then? wood is a porous material. This means that, over time, exposure to water will permeate the wood’s membranes, causing it soften, and fall apart, allowing the deeper oils in those pores to be extracted.

We had previously released a number of oils where one was soaked in the traditional manner as I have explained above and the other not soaked, the key difference in the oil is in its depth and longevity performance. The soaked oil will always out perform none soaked oils due to the fact that the distiller is able to draw out the deep, middle and top layer of the oil. Where as none soaked woods the oil produced is usually only middle and top layer oils. If you imagine the pores in the wood as a cup and divide the cup into bottom, middle and top, that is what is being referred to here.
Thank you for the incredibly thorough response. Very informative.
 
Most of the time the words used to describe oudh aren't oudh specific terminology, and this is very much so online, and those words carry with them pre defined meanings. Fermentation is a metabolic process that produces chemical changes in organic substances through the action of enzymes, the study of this field is known as zymology. So the word has an existing clearly defined meaning, when this is applied to oudh then that meaning will naturally be assumed unless it is redefined, or further explained. As such what i said take that into account, that when distillers in the facilities that actually ferment the woods, i.e that allow for a metabolic process that produces chemical change do so for financial benefit. Why is that so? because they can then place any grade of wood into the fermentation drums, make them go through the process of metabolic chemical change, and distill the matter + the changed constituents to produce an oil that is from oudh wood and this new micro-organism.

Traditional distillation did not use fermentation, what was utilised is clean soaking. Clean soaking with the presence of clean fresh air, so the drums would not be sealed as a deliberate means of avoiding fermentation. So why soak then? wood is a porous material. This means that, over time, exposure to water will permeate the wood’s membranes, causing it soften, and fall apart, allowing the deeper oils in those pores to be extracted.

We had previously released a number of oils where one was soaked in the traditional manner as I have explained above and the other not soaked, the key difference in the oil is in its depth and longevity performance. The soaked oil will always out perform none soaked oils due to the fact that the distiller is able to draw out the deep, middle and top layer of the oil. Where as none soaked woods the oil produced is usually only middle and top layer oils. If you imagine the pores in the wood as a cup and divide the cup into bottom, middle and top, that is what is being referred to here.
Thanks a lot. That was enlightening.
 
LOL lets fast forward to 49 minutes. now i dont understand the language, but i understand what hes talking about and i dont think its cool at all tho...anyone have any idea how we can make sure what this guy is saying doesnt happen to us?
AND HERE IS THE GREAT BOSS SHOWING HOW TO APPLY IT TO WOOD THAT POSSIBLY GET DISTILLED HAHAHAHAHAHA
THE TRUTH CAN NOT BE HIDDEN FOREVER!!!
Since @language scent does not respond, but after this posts elsewhere, I would like to clarify something in response to his above posts.
I don't understand why somebody says "i don't understand the language", and after that make such a big statement.
The video clearly states for Arabic reading people: "different types of scams in oudh".

I want to take this moment to clarify something.
The Arabs has always been falsely portrayed as a "villain" in Western films.
This is the idea of: "keep saying there is a monster under the bed and a child will believe it".
I fear that this stems from things that people have been taught by the media and have unconsciously come to see as truth.
From what I see, this forum is an example of how different nationalities can live in harmony and share a passion with each other. We should encourage that, instead of going along with hatred and division, based on false information.

We should be grateful to this presenter and the people who made this happen, because they warn us about oudh scams that we can fall into unsuspectingly.
 
Last edited:
Top